blob: b523666d845ed700a8ea865960f234c4938e74dd [file] [log] [blame]
/**
* This file has no copyright assigned and is placed in the Public Domain.
* This file is part of the w64 mingw-runtime package.
* No warranty is given; refer to the file DISCLAIMER within this package.
*/
#ifdef _WIN64
.file "exp2f.S"
.text
.align 8
.globl _exp2f
.def _exp2f; .scl 2; .type 32; .endef
_exp2f:
subq $24, %rsp
movss %xmm0,(%rsp)
flds (%rsp)
fxam /* Is NaN or +-Inf? */
fstsw %ax
movb $0x45, %dh
andb %ah, %dh
cmpb $0x05, %dh
je 1f /* Is +-Inf, jump. */
fld %st
frndint /* int(x) */
fsubr %st,%st(1) /* fract(x) */
fxch
f2xm1 /* 2^(fract(x)) - 1 */
fld1
faddp /* 2^(fract(x)) */
fscale /* e^x */
fstp %st(1)
fstps (%rsp)
movss (%rsp),%xmm0
addq $24, %rsp
ret
1: testl $0x200, %eax /* Test sign. */
jz 2f /* If positive, jump. */
fstp %st
fldz /* Set result to 0. */
2: fstps (%rsp)
movss (%rsp),%xmm0
addq $24, %rsp
ret
#else
.file "exp2f.S"
.text
.align 4
.globl _exp2f
.def _exp2f; .scl 2; .type 32; .endef
_exp2f:
flds 4(%esp)
/* I added the following ugly construct because exp(+-Inf) resulted
in NaN. The ugliness results from the bright minds at Intel.
For the i686 the code can be written better.
-- drepper@cygnus.com. */
fxam /* Is NaN or +-Inf? */
fstsw %ax
movb $0x45, %dh
andb %ah, %dh
cmpb $0x05, %dh
je 1f /* Is +-Inf, jump. */
fld %st
frndint /* int(x) */
fsubr %st,%st(1) /* fract(x) */
fxch
f2xm1 /* 2^(fract(x)) - 1 */
fld1
faddp /* 2^(fract(x)) */
fscale /* e^x */
fstp %st(1)
ret
1: testl $0x200, %eax /* Test sign. */
jz 2f /* If positive, jump. */
fstp %st
fldz /* Set result to 0. */
2: ret
#endif